<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: PC Tools Antivirus</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.cleanerreview.com/pc-tools-antivirus/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.cleanerreview.com/pc-tools-antivirus/</link>
	<description>Cleaner Reviews</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 07 Jun 2010 00:10:14 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Farmand</title>
		<link>http://www.cleanerreview.com/pc-tools-antivirus/comment-page-1/#comment-73</link>
		<dc:creator>Farmand</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2009 06:21:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cleanerreview.com/?p=501#comment-73</guid>
		<description>The FREE version SUCKS, but the payed version ROCKS..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The FREE version SUCKS, but the payed version ROCKS..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Podubxy</title>
		<link>http://www.cleanerreview.com/pc-tools-antivirus/comment-page-1/#comment-72</link>
		<dc:creator>Podubxy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2009 06:20:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cleanerreview.com/?p=501#comment-72</guid>
		<description>I was using the PC Tools suite for a while, figuring that when they added anti-virus capability to SpywareDoctor that had to be a good combination.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was using the PC Tools suite for a while, figuring that when they added anti-virus capability to SpywareDoctor that had to be a good combination.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Quilljar</title>
		<link>http://www.cleanerreview.com/pc-tools-antivirus/comment-page-1/#comment-71</link>
		<dc:creator>Quilljar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2009 06:18:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cleanerreview.com/?p=501#comment-71</guid>
		<description>I have used PC Tools freeware for about four years now and found iy
consistently reliable. It is frequently recommended in UK Computer mags.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have used PC Tools freeware for about four years now and found iy<br />
consistently reliable. It is frequently recommended in UK Computer mags.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: El Dutche</title>
		<link>http://www.cleanerreview.com/pc-tools-antivirus/comment-page-1/#comment-70</link>
		<dc:creator>El Dutche</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2009 06:17:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cleanerreview.com/?p=501#comment-70</guid>
		<description>Well, some people who used PC Tools Antivirus told me that it&#039;s not fantastic, but it&#039;s not bad.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, some people who used PC Tools Antivirus told me that it&#8217;s not fantastic, but it&#8217;s not bad.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mjq424</title>
		<link>http://www.cleanerreview.com/pc-tools-antivirus/comment-page-1/#comment-69</link>
		<dc:creator>mjq424</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2009 06:17:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cleanerreview.com/?p=501#comment-69</guid>
		<description>PC Tools Antivirus standalone is not fantastic (it is free though), but their Spyware Doctor is very good. I have heard that AV-Comparatives may by testing the combined Spyware Doctor with Antivirus, which should be pretty good</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>PC Tools Antivirus standalone is not fantastic (it is free though), but their Spyware Doctor is very good. I have heard that AV-Comparatives may by testing the combined Spyware Doctor with Antivirus, which should be pretty good</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vladimyr</title>
		<link>http://www.cleanerreview.com/pc-tools-antivirus/comment-page-1/#comment-68</link>
		<dc:creator>Vladimyr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2009 06:15:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cleanerreview.com/?p=501#comment-68</guid>
		<description>For home use, I would first choose Avast or Avira ( I haven&#039;t tried Avira 9 yet) before AVG 8.5 Free or PC Tools 6.0. I find both the latter slow the PCs more noticeably.
For free Commercial use, I think PCTAV 6.0 has a better AV component than Comodo&#039;s, and it bothers the user less. Comodo AV doesn&#039;t do too much but it also doesn&#039;t tax system resources very much while doing it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For home use, I would first choose Avast or Avira ( I haven&#8217;t tried Avira 9 yet) before AVG 8.5 Free or PC Tools 6.0. I find both the latter slow the PCs more noticeably.<br />
For free Commercial use, I think PCTAV 6.0 has a better AV component than Comodo&#8217;s, and it bothers the user less. Comodo AV doesn&#8217;t do too much but it also doesn&#8217;t tax system resources very much while doing it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
